The Epistemic Intermediary: Analyzing the Ascendance of Curation and Synthesis Culture in the Digital Information Age

The contemporary information ecosystem is currently defined by a fundamental transition from a discovery-oriented paradigm to one characterized by pervasive curation and synthesis. As digital content production reaches an unprecedented volume, the role of the individual has shifted from a primary seeker of raw data to a consumer of mediated interpretations. This shift is not merely a change in habit but a structural evolution of the cognitive and social processes that govern how knowledge is formed, validated, and disseminated. Curation and synthesis culture represents a state in which the value of information is derived increasingly from its contextualization and aggregation rather than its original production. In this environment, society is witnessing a widening of the degrees of separation between the source of information and its ultimate consumer, often to the point where second-hand summaries and algorithmically generated overviews are accepted as the definitive version of reality.

The Semantic Architecture of Curation and Synthesis

To understand the current condition, one must first delineate the theoretical boundaries of curation and synthesis within the digital context. Digital curation is formally defined as the process of finding, selecting, grouping, contextualizing, preserving, and sharing digital content.1 In the early 21st century, the term "curation" migrated from its traditional institutional roots in museums and libraries into the broader digital sphere, where it now describes a creative process of bringing together a "tapestry of digital artifacts" to construct new meaning or provide alternative perspectives.1 Unlike traditional archival care, digital curation focuses on the transformation of aggregated information into new knowledge artifacts.1

Synthesis culture, a corollary to digital curation, refers to the systematic collection, analysis, and integration of information from disparate sources to create a holistic understanding of complex phenomena.4 It bridges gaps in understanding by creating narratives that synthesize historical contexts, academic research, and diverse cultural perspectives.4 This culture is legitimized through institutionalized social processes involving planning and communication, shifting society from a model that avoids examining these processes to one that centralizes them as the primary mode of cultural production.5

Theoretical Frameworks of Information Processing

The transition to a synthesis-led society is supported by several pedagogical and theoretical models. The "Seek-Sense-Share" model, attributed to Harold Jarche, provides a structured framework for this process.1

Stage

Mechanism

Social/Cognitive Function

Seek

Navigating complexity through "social listening" across multiple digital channels to identify patterns and relevant data.1

Discovery and initial filtering of the "information tidal wave".1

Sense

Personal reflection and contextualization, often through blogging or multimodal composition, to provide a unique viewpoint.1

Constructing meaning and internalizing information through creative reconstruction.1

Share

Fostering personal learning networks (PLN) to exchange ideas and encourage conversation.1

Disseminating the synthesized narrative and establishing a community-validated reality.1

This framework positions the "curator" as a figure of agency, capable of making change across cultural and institutional contexts.6 The curator is not a passive middleman but an editor of the "internet ether," organizing chaos into a discernible reality.3 As digital curation is increasingly framed as a "core digital literacy" in higher education, it reflects an emergent pedagogy that prioritizes critical thinking and social engagement.1

The Historical Descent: From Museum to Micro-Feed

The evolution toward synthesis culture is inseparable from the broader history of the Information Age. This era, beginning in the mid-20th century, is marked by a shift from industrial economies to those centered on information technology.7 The technological progression from transistors to microprocessors facilitated the democratization of computing power, eventually leading to the mainstreaming of the World Wide Web in the late 1980s.7

The Generational Web Shift

The evolution of the web provides the infrastructure for the degrees of separation currently observed in society.

Era

Technological Catalyst

Information Model

User Relation to Source

Web 1.0 (1989–2005)

Static HTML, search engines.

The Library: Static information networks.8

Users accessed primary sources or directories of sources directly.8

Web 2.0 (2005–Present)

AJAX, Social Media, Smartphones.

The Public Square: Participative, interactive platforms.7

Users began producing content, often remixing or reacting to primary sources.8

Web 3.0 (Future-Current)

Intelligent algorithms, AI integration.

The Networked Brain: Structured, machine-readable data.8

Information is personalized and predictive; original sources are often abstracted into "data points".8

Web 4.0 (Future)

Autonomous agents, intelligent future.

The Synthesis Engine: Integrated, intelligent synthesis.8

Direct answers provided by agents on behalf of users; original content becomes the "training set".8

As society moved into the Web 2.0 paradigm, the "tidal wave of content" created by user participation necessitated a move away from manual search toward algorithmic curation.1 TikTok’s "attention factory" design, which prioritizes immersive flow and behavioral capture, represents the apex of this shift, contrasting sharply with YouTube’s earlier "repository model" of discovery.9 This architectural shift encodes an ideology of convenience, where the effort of evaluating information is replaced by the frictionless consumption of pre-selected feeds.11

The Attention Economy: Scarcity as a Structural Catalyst

The proliferation of digital information has inverted the economics of knowledge. As argued by Herbert Simon, a wealth of information creates a "poverty of attention".11 In the contemporary digital economy, attention is the scarcest and most valuable resource, leading to a system where platforms compete to capture, quantify, and monetize human focus.11

Bounded Rationality and Algorithmic Gatekeeping

Within the attention economy, the human condition of "bounded rationality" becomes both a vulnerability and a target.12 Users, overwhelmed by an endless quantity of information, experience cognitive exhaustion and a decline in well-being.11 To cope, they rely on algorithms to act as decision-makers, pre-selecting and sequencing content.11 These algorithmic systems operate on the assumption that past behaviors are predictive of future evaluations—a principle known as collaborative filtering.2

This reliance on algorithmic discovery creates a "bubble" or echo chamber effect, where users are predominantly exposed to viewpoints that confirm preexisting beliefs.12 The algorithmic filtering of content constrains the discovery of new ideas, and as platforms prioritize speed, emotionality, and shareability over depth and accuracy, the editorial autonomy of the individual is undermined.12

Cost of Algorithmic Curation

Emotional and Cognitive Impact

Invasive Personalization

Over-targeting and irrelevant ads lead to a sense of being "let down" by technology.15

Commodification of Trends

Original cultural movements (e.g., "Brat Summer") are quickly politicized and commodified, alienating the original audience.15

Normalizing Harm

Algorithms can regress societal views by promoting harmful gender norms (e.g., "tradwives" or "coquettes") or radicalizing pipelines.15

Selective News Avoidance

Information overload leads 4 out of 10 consumers to occasionally or frequently avoid news due to emotional exhaustion.14

The Mechanics of Intermediation: Degrees of Separation

The fundamental question of whether society is accepting second-hand sources as original versions is answered by the structural "degrees of separation" inherent in modern information flow. In social network theory, the degree of separation is the social distance between two individuals, measured by the number of intermediary ties.16 In information systems, this refers to the number of "hops" across a graph required to connect a primary source to an end consumer.17

From Primary to Tertiary: The Information Hierarchy

Information is traditionally categorized by its proximity to the original event.

  • Primary Sources: Original materials providing firsthand evidence (e.g., interview transcripts, statistical data, original artwork, government reports).18
  • Secondary Sources: Interpretations, summaries, or analyses of primary sources (e.g., textbooks, history books, literary criticism, documentaries).18
  • Tertiary Sources: Compilations or digests that index and organize other sources (e.g., Wikipedia, dictionaries, bibliographies).20

In a curation culture, the distinction between these categories is blurring. Secondary sources, such as algorithmically surfaced headlines or creator commentaries, are increasingly treated as primary data points by consumers.14 When news on platforms like TikTok comes from influencers (68%) as often as news outlets (67%), the influencer’s interpretation effectively becomes the "original" version of the event for that audience.22

The "Small World" of Information Hops

The "Six Degrees of Separation" theory, pioneered by Stanley Milgram, suggests that short chains of intermediate acquaintances connect any two people.24 In the digital age, this gap has shrunk. Facebook’s analysis indicated an average degree of separation of 3.5 among its users, a distance that continues to decrease as the network grows.17

This shrinking distance between nodes does not necessarily imply closer proximity to truth. In the context of "connected data," relationships between entities—people, products, and transactions—reveal context that flat records overlook.26 However, in a business or information network, connections are often intermediated through "project nodes" or "platform nodes," meaning that for an individual to reach a primary source, they must traverse layers of algorithmic and corporate mediation.17

The Erosion of Provenance: Traceability in the Digital Age

A significant harm of synthesis culture is the "information provenance problem".27 Provenance refers to the origin, source, and history of ownership or location of an information object.28 In scientific and medical contexts, provenance leads to higher interpretability of results and enables reliable collaboration.29 However, as data is manipulated, transformed, and shared across distributed computing infrastructures like the cloud, traceability becomes a ubiquitous problem.30

Traceability Challenges in Healthcare and Science

The lack of robust provenance tracking has critical implications. In clinical research, the lack of comprehensive evidence on provenance approaches hinders the uptake of good scientific practice.29 For medical decision-making, where data is sensitive and often obtained in emergencies, the inability to verify the origin and lineage of data results in risks to both security and data availability.30

Dimension of Provenance

Operational Requirement

Consequence of Failure

Observed Provenance

Recording system changes or events directly as they happen.31

Inability to reproduce results or verify the authenticity of findings.29

Possible Provenance

Inferring or reconstructing metadata from contextual knowledge after the fact.31

High degree of uncertainty; "abductive reasoning" may lead to logical but incorrect conclusions.31

Observed "Hops"

Tracking the international sourcing of clinical samples across multiple countries.33

Increased "degrees of separation" between the source and the end-user, threatening reliability.33

The demand for "open geospatial science" and complex computational pipelines has increased the need for machine-readable provenance.32 Yet, the cost of implementation often hinders adoption outside the scientific domain.31 As society accepts synthesized summaries, it implicitly accepts a loss of traceability, trusting the "intermediary" (whether a platform or an AI) to have verified the lineage of the data.

The Acceptance of the Secondary: "Newsfluencers" and the Creator Economy

The social trend of accepting second-hand sources as original versions is most visible in the rise of the "Creator Economy" and its intersection with journalism. Digital content creators, often called "newsfluencers," are gaining a large foothold in the news sphere.34 Audiences are migrating away from legacy media to social platforms where many young people place more trust in TikTokers than in journalists at storied news outlets.34

The News Discovery Shift: Pew Research Data (2024–2025)

The shift in trust and reliance is quantifiable. Younger audiences, in particular, are becoming more dependent on social media feeds and aggregators than on direct news sources.14

Platform news usage

% of U.S. Adults (2024/25)

% of Adults under 30 (2024/25)

YouTube

37% 35

41% 36

Facebook

48% 35

41% 36

Instagram

20% 35

40% 36

TikTok

17% 35

43% 36

X (Twitter)

12% 35

21% 36

TikTok stands out as a unique "attention factory" where news is encountered passively. Only 41% of users cite getting news as a reason they use the site, yet 90% report seeing news-related content through opinion-based or humor-based posts.22 On TikTok, the algorithm often shows users news from creators they do not follow, prioritizing "emotional hooks" and "visceral writing" over traditional journalistic standards.22

Case Analysis: Viral Synthesis and Cultural Commodification

Specific examples highlight how society accepts synthesized versions as the original experience.

  • Dylan Page and V Spehar: These creators synthesize daily news into short, entertaining videos. Page, known as the "News Daddy" of TikTok, has established a relationship with his audience that supersedes the original reports he summarizes.34 Spehar's method of "crawling under their desk" to explain complex events like the Jan. 6 attack created a sense of intimacy and authenticity that traditional newsrooms struggle to replicate.34
  • Infotainment as Political Education: In Pakistan, youth use satire programs like Hasb-e-Haal as an easy point of entry to political debate. This "infotainment" performs a dual role: it facilitates democratic involvement while simultaneously encouraging a shallow understanding of political reality.23
  • Viral Infographics and Marketing: Brands like Liquid Death and Duolingo use "shock humor" and memes—compact expressions of identity alignment—to reach consumers.39 In these cases, the "viral content" is the primary reality for the consumer, who may never interact with the brand's primary product or mission statement directly.

Harms and Benefits of the Synthesis Condition

The transition to a curation and synthesis culture is not inherently negative, but it presents a series of profound ethical and cognitive challenges.

The Harms of Mediated Knowledge

The most significant risk is the erosion of critical thinking skills. As AI and algorithmic tools provide direct answers, the "click" through to an original source disappears.41

  1. Model Collapse and Crisis of Trust: As AI-generated content (synthetic data) increasingly populates the web, there is a risk of models being trained on "artificial intelligence" rather than real-world data, potentially exacerbating biases and hallucinations.42
  2. Cognitive Disengagement: Students using AI for writing and assessments may lose the metacognitive engagement necessary for deep learning.44 Educators are increasingly questioning whether classroom work accurately reflects a student's cognitive processes.45
  3. Diminished Provenance: In scientific and medical research, the lack of traceable provenance leads to issues with reproducibility and data security.29
  4. Polarization: Algorithmic curation creates individual "bubbles," where the discovery of new or challenging ideas is algorithmically constrained.12

The Benefits of Strategic Synthesis

Conversely, synthesis culture offers powerful tools for managing the information deluge.

  1. Democratization of Participation: Curation platforms allow diverse voices to contribute to the "cultural tapestry," facilitating cultural diversity and globalization.1
  2. Personal Knowledge Management (PKM): Digital curation allows individuals to filter and contextualize the "tidal wave of content," fostering personal learning networks and professional development.1
  3. Educational Scaffolding: AI tools can provide personalized learning experiences and intelligent tutoring, improving academic outcomes when used as a supplement to human interaction.46
  4. Synthetic Research Imperatives: For businesses, synthetic research—generating artificial data to mimic real-world audiences—offers unprecedented advantages in speed, scale, and cost-efficiency.43

The Synthesis Engine: AI and the Future of Discovery (2025-2030)

The future of curation and synthesis culture is inextricably linked to the advancement of artificial intelligence. Generative AI (GAI) is transitioning from a tool for narrow tasks to an autonomous "synthesis engine" that mediates the entire search landscape.10

The Shift from Search to Synthesis

In 2025, the web's attention economy is undergoing a "quiet change" in behavior. Visibility on the internet is no longer won by ranking high in search results, but by being cited in an AI summary.41

Metric

Impact of AI Overviews (2025)

External Link Clicks

8% with AI summary vs. 15% without.41

Organic Click-Through Rate

Fell from 1.41% to 0.64% (Jan-Mar 2025).41

Referral Traffic Loss

Publishers report steady drops of up to 25%.41

Visibility Gain (GEO)

Citation in AI answers increases exposure 7x compared to traditional ranking.41

This has given rise to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO), a strategy that prioritizes structured data and "citation" over traditional keywords.41 The unit of value in this new economy is the citation—the machine's acknowledgment of a source's validity within a synthesized narrative.

The Discovery Engine Methodology

A more advanced development is the "Discovery Engine" (DE), a conceptual platform designed to synthesize entire scientific fields into dynamic, machine-readable "Conceptual Nexus Models" (CNM).49 These models capture the "intricate web of relationships" between concepts, methods, and findings, moving beyond the document-based storage of the past.49

In this scenario, AI agents interact with these "World Models" in a zero-shot fashion to infer new knowledge or validate hypotheses.49 While this accelerates discovery, it also places the AI as the ultimate intermediary. The human researcher is freed to focus on "interpretation and creativity," but they are simultaneously one more degree removed from the raw experimental data.

Futurist Scenarios for 2030

By 2030, AI is expected to be an "invisible yet indispensable" part of societal functioning.50

  • Data Ubiquity: Companies will approach "data ubiquity," with data embedded in all systems, interactions, and decision points.51
  • Personalized Learning: Education will move from standardized courses to student-centered models customized by AI content curation.52
  • Synthetic Interaction: AI agents will interact with "digital twins" of customers to test products before real-world rollout.51
  • The Ethical Imperative: Issues related to privacy, data ownership, and "artificial intelligence literacy" will become top priorities.50

Strategic Implications for Organizations

For organizations and practitioners navigating this shift, the "Synthesis Paradox" requires a fundamental rethink of strategy.

  1. Embracing "Seek-Sense-Share": Organizations must foster an "information culture" that nurtures digital curation as a core competency.53 This involves not just collecting data but adding the "value of selection and organization".2
  2. Navigating the Trust Crisis: As synthetic data becomes more prevalent, establishing "expertise signals" and maintaining high-quality primary records will be essential to ensure visibility in AI systems.43
  3. Designing for "Agent Experience" (AX): As autonomous agents begin to interact with services on behalf of humans, product teams must design for machine interpretation as well as human usability.43
  4. Promoting Information Literacy: Society must equip citizens with the ability to "understand and work alongside AI," recognizing the difference between synthesized answers and primary evidence.45

Conclusion

Curation and synthesis culture is the definitive hallmark of the early 21st-century digital society. It is a response to the "tidal wave of content" and the scarcity of human attention, facilitated by a technological descent from the static web to the intelligent synthesis engines of the future. While this shift democratizes access to information and provides powerful tools for personal and organizational growth, it simultaneously introduces a dangerous erosion of provenance and critical engagement.

Society is indeed beginning to accept second-hand, synthesized sources as the original version of reality. Whether through the "newsfluencer" who interprets world events or the AI that summarizes complex research, the end consumer is increasingly one or more "hops" removed from the primary evidence. This separation creates a fragility in the knowledge ecosystem, where model collapse and algorithmic bias can distort the collective understanding of truth.

The role of artificial intelligence in the future will be to solidify this intermediation. By 2030, the transition from "search" to "synthesis" will likely be complete, with "Discovery Engines" and autonomous agents serving as the primary interfaces for human knowledge. To thrive in this environment, society must not only embrace the efficiencies of synthesis but also protect the "indispensable human element"—the critical inquiry, creative interpretation, and ethical oversight that ensure information serves the public good. The strategic challenge of the next decade is to build a knowledge infrastructure that is both machine-readable and human-verifiable, bridging the gap between the synthetic answer and the original source.


Analytical Post-Script on Social Dynamics and Information Epidemics

The probability of an information "epidemic"—where a synthesized narrative spreads like an infectious disease—is a function of network centrality and social influence.27 Epidemiological modeling of information spread indicates that clusters of beliefs are significantly larger than expected by chance, with influence extending up to three degrees of separation in a social network.16 In this context, the "happy" or "viral" synthesis spreads not because of its proximity to truth, but because of the number of "intermediary ties" that validate it within a local network.16

The relationship between ego and alter happiness, or belief, can be quantified: A person is Image1 13 (Image3 12 confidence interval Image2 13 to Image5 8) more likely to adopt a synthesized belief if a directly connected peer (distance 1) adopts it. The effect for distance two peers is Image4 10, and for distance three is Image6 8.16

This quantitative reality underscores the power of the "Synthesis Culture": when the network itself becomes the validator, the original source (distance 0) becomes increasingly irrelevant to the survival and spread of the narrative. As society moves into an era of "possible provenance" and AI-mediated discovery, the maintenance of the "shortest path" to primary evidence is no longer just a technical requirement—it is a societal necessity for the preservation of objective reality.

Works cited

  1. Digital curation | Advance HE, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/digital-curation-0
  2. Content curation - Wikipedia, accessed February 14, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_curation
  3. What Does It Mean To “Curate”? - Milwaukee Art Museum Blog, accessed February 14, 2026, https://blog.mam.org/2012/06/15/what-does-it-mean-to-curate/
  4. GLOCALIZING THE METAVERSE - POLITesi, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.politesi.polimi.it/retrieve/49021490-1565-41ea-bba3-b6219f83a877/2023_10_Arjmandi%20.pdf
  5. formance, through the alteration of organizational members' on-the-job behaviors. (Porras and Robertson, 1992) - SweetStudy, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.sweetstudy.com/sites/default/files/qx/15/10/04/07/chapter_2-3.pdf
  6. MA Culture, Criticism and Curation - University of the Arts London, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.arts.ac.uk/subjects/curation-and-culture/postgraduate/ma-culture-criticism-and-curation-csm
  7. Information Age - Wikipedia, accessed February 14, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Age
  8. The Evolution of the Internet – Web 1.0, Web 2.0, Web 3.0, Web 4.0 - SEEBURGER Blog, accessed February 14, 2026, https://blog.seeburger.com/the-evolution-of-the-internet-web-1-0-web-2-0-web-3-0-web-4-0/
  9. View of John M. Jordan, The Rise of the Algorithms: How YouTube and TikTok Conquered the World | International Journal of Communication, accessed February 14, 2026, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/26153/5178
  10. AI Agents: Evolution, Architecture, and Real-World Applications - arXiv.org, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2503.12687v1
  11. Living inside the Attention Economy: How Small Design Shapes Our Attention - Medium, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@digitaleconomystudentatkcl/living-inside-the-attention-economy-how-small-design-shapes-our-attention-e1a5bfdf19cb
  12. The Fragmentation of Human Attention in the Digital Age: Challenges and Prospects for Small and Medium Enterprises​ | by Boris (Bruce) Kriger | BUSINESS EXPERT NEWS, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/business-expert-news/the-fragmentation-of-human-attention-in-the-digital-age-challenges-and-prospects-for-small-and-ea22161d23e5
  13. The Attention Economy - Humane Tech, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.humanetech.com/youth/the-attention-economy
  14. Journalism In The Age Of The Attention Economy ... - Kurdish Studies, accessed February 14, 2026, https://kurdishstudies.net/menu-script/index.php/KS/article/download/3970/2684/7680
  15. Algorithm Overload: Why consumers are muting you right now (Pt.1) - Research World, accessed February 14, 2026, https://researchworld.com/articles/algorithm-overload-why-consumers-are-muting-you-right-now-pt-1
  16. Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study | The BMJ, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.bmj.com/content/337/bmj.a2338
  17. Analyzing a Manufacturing Supply Chain with a Social Network Graph | Elastic Blog, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.elastic.co/blog/analyzing-a-high-tech-manufacturing-supply-chain-with-social-network-theory
  18. Primary vs. secondary sources – Microsoft 365, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/writing/primary-vs-secondary-sources
  19. What Is the Difference Between a Primary and Secondary Source?, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.wgu.edu/blog/what-difference-between-primary-secondary-source2304.html
  20. Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources | University of Minnesota Crookston, accessed February 14, 2026, https://crk.umn.edu/library/primary-secondary-and-tertiary-sources
  21. Primary vs. Secondary Sources | Difference & Examples - Scribbr, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/primary-and-secondary-sources/
  22. A closer look at Americans' experiences with news on TikTok - Pew Research Center, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/01/17/a-closer-look-at-americans-experiences-with-news-on-tiktok/
  23. Infotainment and Youth Political Perceptions in ... - Scholars Crossing, accessed February 14, 2026, https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=8854&context=doctoral
  24. US7069308B2 - System, method and apparatus for connecting users in an online computer system based on their relationships within social networks - Google Patents, accessed February 14, 2026, https://patents.google.com/patent/US7069308B2/en
  25. Seven degrees of separation in mobile ad hoc networks - SciSpace, accessed February 14, 2026, https://scispace.com/pdf/seven-degrees-of-separation-in-mobile-ad-hoc-networks-4955vzczwb.pdf
  26. Connected Data - TigerGraph, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.tigergraph.com/glossary/connected-data/
  27. A New Supervised Epidemic Model for Intelligent Viral Content Classification - DergiPark, accessed February 14, 2026, https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/243554
  28. Provenance – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis, accessed February 14, 2026, https://taylorandfrancis.com/knowledge/Engineering_and_technology/Computer_science/Provenance/
  29. Provenance Information for Biomedical Data and Workflows: Scoping Review - PMC, accessed February 14, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11380065/
  30. Provenance Data Management in Health Information Systems: A Systematic Literature Review - PMC, accessed February 14, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10303902/
  31. Observed vs. Possible Provenance - USENIX, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.usenix.org/sites/default/files/tapp2021_blount.pdf
  32. Towards Provenance-Aware Earth Observation Workflows: the openEO Case Study - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2506.08597v1
  33. Biosample provenance: what researchers need to know - Bioscience Today, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.biosciencetoday.co.uk/biosample-provenance-what-researchers-need-to-know/
  34. Content Creators and Journalists: Redefining News and Credibility, accessed February 14, 2026, https://knightcenter.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Content-Creator-and-Journalists.pdf
  35. Social Media and News Fact Sheet, 2024 | Pew Research Center, accessed February 14, 2026, https://internet.psych.wisc.edu/wp-content/uploads/532-Master/532-UnitPages/Unit-05/Pew_SocialMedia_2024.pdf
  36. TikTok now top choice for news consumption by Gen-Z social-media users, accessed February 14, 2026, https://capitolcommunicator.com/tiktok-now-top-choice-for-news-consumption-by-gen-z-social-media-users/
  37. How Americans Get News on TikTok, X, Facebook and Instagram | Pew Research Center, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/06/12/how-americans-get-news-on-tiktok-x-facebook-and-instagram/
  38. How TikTok Is Changing the Way We Write and Consume News | by Nguyen Thai Huy Lam, accessed February 14, 2026, https://medium.com/@lamnguyen.180903/how-tiktok-is-changing-the-way-we-write-and-consume-news-b095de9018c0
  39. TikTok Brands That Went Viral (2025): Case Studies & Playbook | new/day studio, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.newdaystudio.co/blog/tiktok-brands-that-went-viral
  40. Ultimate Guide: Unleash The Secrets Of Creating Viral Content That Spreads Like Wildfire, accessed February 14, 2026, https://thedigitalcauldron.com/ultimate-guide-unleash-the-secrets-of-creating-viral-content-that-spreads-like-wildfire/
  41. How AI Is Rewriting the Web's Attention Economy – The Economics ..., accessed February 14, 2026, https://theeconreview.com/2025/12/12/how-ai-is-rewriting-the-webs-attention-economy/
  42. Synthetic Data and the Future of AI - Cornell Law School, accessed February 14, 2026, https://publications.lawschool.cornell.edu/lawreview/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/Lee-final-2.pdf
  43. Research report: The state of synthetic research in 2025 - Conversion Alchemy, accessed February 14, 2026, https://christophersilvestri.com/research-reports/state-of-synthetic-research-in-2025/
  44. The impact of generative AI on academic reading and writing: a synthesis of recent evidence (2023–2025) - Frontiers, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1711718/full
  45. Shaping the Future of Learning: The Role of AI in Education 4.0, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Shaping_the_Future_of_Learning_2024.pdf
  46. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students' Academic Development - MDPI, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/15/3/343
  47. Enhancing Information Literacy through Generative AI in the Library Classroom, accessed February 14, 2026, https://palrap.org/ojs/palrap/article/view/302
  48. (PDF) Examining the Impact of Generative AI on Information ..., accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387745023_Examining_the_Impact_of_Generative_AI_on_Information_Discovery_Digital_Business_Models_and_the_Future_of_Online_Publishing
  49. The Discovery Engine: A Framework for AI-Driven Synthesis and Navigation of Scientific Knowledge Landscapes - arXiv, accessed February 14, 2026, https://arxiv.org/html/2505.17500v1
  50. (PDF) Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030- The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence - ResearchGate, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392521565_Artificial_Intelligence_and_Life_in_2030-_The_One_Hundred_Year_Study_on_Artificial_Intelligence
  51. Charting a path to the data- and AI-driven enterprise of 2030 - McKinsey, accessed February 14, 2026, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/tech-and-ai/our-insights/charting-a-path-to-the-data-and-ai-driven-enterprise-of-2030
  52. The class of 2030 and life-ready learning: The technology imperative - Microsoft Industry Clouds, accessed February 14, 2026, https://info.microsoft.com/rs/157-GQE-382/images/EN-US-CNTNT-Whitepaper-Education-Class-of-2030-report.pdf
  53. Information Literacy in the Artificial Intelligence Era: A Proposed Framework - PDXScholar, accessed February 14, 2026, https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1772&context=comminfolit